Blog Single

The Trigger Most CFOs Miss

It’s May 2026. Your balance sheet shows AED 50 million in goodwill from an acquisition. Then geopolitical tensions spike, commodity prices fall, or a key client signals trouble. Your CFO asks: “Do we need to test for impairment?”

The answer is almost always yes — but most UAE finance teams don’t know WHERE to start.

This is where IAS 36 becomes your lifeline or your liability.

What IAS 36 Actually Requires

IAS 36 Impairment of Assets doesn’t care if your goodwill is “sticky” — it demands that you assess, at each reporting date, whether an asset may be impaired. Period.

The Standard’s Trigger Points (Your Checklist):

1. External indicators: Market value decline, adverse market conditions, increased interest rates
2. Internal indicators: Underperformance vs. plan, asset obsolescence, reorganization announcements
3. Geopolitical risk: Supply chain disruption, regional instability, sanctions, conflict exposure

If ANY of these are present, IAS 36 requires impairment testing. Not optional. Not “if you feel like it.” Required.

The Two-Level Test (Simplified for Practice)

Level 1 — Carrying Amount vs. Recoverable Amount

Recoverable Amount = Higher of:

• Fair Value Less Costs of Disposal (FVLCD)
• Value in Use (VIU)

If your asset’s carrying amount exceeds recoverable amount → Impairment Loss exists.

Level 2 — Calculate the Loss & Journal It

Impairment Loss = Carrying Amount − Recoverable Amount

This goes directly to P&L (or OCI if the asset is available-for-sale), and goodwill impairment is never reversed.

The Geopolitical Wildcard: 2026 Reality

Here’s what most UAE CFOs are NOT doing:

❌ Missing the Impact:

• Assuming their Middle East operations are “too diversified” to be affected
• Not stress-testing their cash flow projections for supply chain delays
• Ignoring currency volatility in their VIU calculations

✅ What They SHOULD Be Doing:

1. Identify exposed assets: Which goodwill, intangibles, or PPE depend on Middle East supply chains, financing, or client concentration?
2. Stress-test assumptions: Run VIU calculations with 10–20% downside scenarios on revenue and margin assumptions
3. Document the rationale: If you test and conclude no impairment, document WHY — this is your defense if the FTA or auditors question it later
4. Disclose in the footnotes: IAS 36:134 requires disclosure of key assumptions, sensitivities, and management judgment — especially critical in volatile periods

The Tax Deductibility Trap (UAE Corporate Tax)

Here’s the subtle trap: IAS 36 impairment losses are NOT automatically deductible under UAE Corporate Tax.

Under Article 33 of Federal Decree-Law 17/2025, impairment of assets is generally deductible if it reflects an actual economic decline in the asset’s value. But the FTA will scrutinize:

• Is the impairment supported by market evidence, not just management opinion?
• Did you perform a proper VIU calculation with arm’s length assumptions?
• Are your cash flow projections realistic, or are they pessimistic?

Pro tip: If your impairment loss is large, coordinate with your tax advisor to ensure the underlying assumptions align with what the FTA will accept as “deductible loss.”

The Practical Workflow (Next 48 Hours)

If you suspect impairment, here’s your action plan:

Day 1:

1. List all material goodwill, intangibles, and long-lived assets
2. Identify which are sensitive to current geopolitical, market, or client risks
3. Pull your original acquisition/valuation files — you need the original VIU model

Day 2:

1. Update cash flow projections with current market data
2. Recalculate VIU using risk-adjusted discount rates (WACC)
3. Compare to carrying amount
4. If impairment exists, journal the loss and prepare the footnote disclosure

Day 3:

1. Coordinate with your external auditor (they WILL test this)
2. Send to tax advisor for CT deductibility review
3. File and close

The Disclosure Standard (Don’t Skip This)

IAS 36:134 requires you to disclose:

• The assumptions used in VIU calculations (revenue growth, margins, discount rate)
• Sensitivity analysis: “If WACC increases by 1%, impairment would be X”
• Management judgment: “We tested for impairment due to [specific trigger]”

This disclosure is your evidence that you knew the risk and addressed it properly.

What Auditors Are Asking This Year

Big Four firms are ramping up IAS 36 scrutiny in 2026, especially for:

• Companies with Middle East exposure
• Goodwill balances exceeding 10% of total assets
• Entities that have NOT tested for impairment since acquisition

Expected audit question: “Walk us through your impairment testing logic for [specific asset].”

If you don’t have a documented answer, expect a finding.

Bottom Line

IAS 36 impairment testing is not busywork — it’s a material financial reporting and tax issue. In volatile markets, CFOs who skip this or defer it are exposed to:

1. Audit findings (and management letter comments)
2. Tax exposure (if the FTA argues the impairment wasn’t deductible)
3. Shareholder/creditor challenges (if they later discover you buried a loss)

The fix: Test now. Document thoroughly. Disclose completely. Coordinate with your tax and audit teams.

Your 2026 financial statements depend on it.

---

FSH Financial Consultants specializes in IAS 36 impairment analysis and UAE Corporate Tax coordination for UAE businesses. If you need a proper impairment assessment or tax coordination, reach out.