Blog Single

The Middle East tensions that erupted in late May 2026 have forced a quiet but critical conversation in the finance offices of UAE businesses with regional assets, investments, or operations. The question: Has your asset value fundamentally changed?

If you hold goodwill, intangible assets, property, or investments with any geographic or operational exposure to conflict-affected regions, or if your business depends on supply chains, customer bases, or financing from those areas, IAS 36 impairment testing is no longer theoretical. It is live today.

What IAS 36 Requires The Basics

Under International Financial Reporting Standards, an asset is impaired when its carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount. Recoverable amount is the higher of:

• Fair value less costs of disposal (FVLCD) what you could sell it for today, minus transaction costs
• Value in use (VIU) the present value of future cash flows from continued use

The impairment loss equals the difference, and it flows through profit or loss (or OCI for certain assets). It is irreversible for goodwill. For other assets, reversals are allowed only if conditions improve.

Why June 2026 is Different

Geopolitical events trigger impairment testing for two reasons:

1. Change in Cash Flow Expectations
If conflict restricts supply chains, reduces customer demand, raises financing costs, or blocks market access in the Middle East or globally, the future cash flows you forecasted six months ago are no longer reliable. A logistics company with hubs in a conflict-adjacent zone must rebase its VIU. A trading company with Iranian counterparties faces collection uncertainty. A hospitality business dependent on regional tourism must revise demand curves.

2. Change in Market Conditions Fair Value Shift
Asset prices shift when risk premia increase. Commercial real estate in stability-questioned regions becomes harder to sell. Equipment and inventory in conflict zones face buyer wariness. Securities and equity investments in regionally-exposed sectors repriced immediately on May 28.

The CFO Judgment Call Triggering Events

IAS 36 requires testing when a triggering event occurs. The standard lists examples:

• Observable decline in asset market value
• Adverse changes in technology, markets, economics, or laws
• Underperformance vs. budget
• Changes to asset use or disposal plans

The May 2026 geopolitical shift is a textbook adverse change in the economic environment. The question is not whether a triggering event occurred it did. The question is which assets it affects.

This is where CFOs are getting it wrong: Many assume my business is not in the conflict zone, so I don’t need to test. That is false. Impairment testing applies to any asset whose cash flows or market conditions deteriorated as a result of the event, whether the asset is physically located in the conflict zone or not.

What You Must Test The Scope

Goodwill from acquisitions especially of regional businesses, supply chain companies, or entities with Middle East operations. Rebase the value-in-use model. If the synergies or earnings power that justified the acquisition price are now at risk, goodwill impairs.

Intangible assets customer relationships, trade names, contracts with regional counterparties. If contract duration, renewal likelihood, or cash contribution has changed, test.

Property, plant and equipment particularly in logistically sensitive sectors (import/export, transport, distribution). If equipment faces underutilization or sale pressure, test FVLCD.

Financial assets receivables from regional customers, equity investments in regionally-exposed companies, debt securities. Assess credit risk under IFRS 9 ECL (Expected Credit Loss) provisions. ECL and impairment are separate but related for debt assets.

Investment property commercial real estate with geographic or tenant concentration risk. Fair value reassessment is immediate.

Investments in associates and JVs apply equity method assets to the same logic. If the associate’s or JV’s earning power has deteriorated due to regional exposure, the carrying amount may impair.

The Audit Reality What Auditors Are Testing

External auditors are already querying clients on impairment assumptions for June 2026 financial statements. Expect:

• Challenge to cash flow forecasts auditors will question why June-onward revenue and cost assumptions remain unchanged when the risk environment just shifted
• Request for sensitivity analysis what happens to asset value if revenue falls 5%, 10%, 20%?
• Equity method JV/associate reviews auditors will ask for evidence that the investee’s earnings have not deteriorated
• Goodwill testing on acquired companies with any regional exposure this is the highest-risk area for 2026
• IFRS 7 disclosure scrutiny do your financial instrument disclosures (credit risk, concentration risk, sensitivity analysis) reflect the changed environment?

Auditors are protecting themselves. If your audit file shows no impairment testing was performed after the May 2026 event, and impairment should have been recorded, the auditor faces criticism for missing a material issue. They will push back hard on any assumption that our business is not affected.

What You Must Do Now Practical Steps

Step 1: Segment your assets by geographic and operational exposure
List every material asset: goodwill, intangibles, PP&E, investments, receivables. Mark which ones have:

• Direct operations in conflict-adjacent zones
• Supply chain dependence on those zones
• Customer concentration in those regions
• Financing or counterparty exposure to affected entities
• Ability to be sold only to buyers in affected regions

Step 2: Update cash flow forecasts
For each exposed asset or asset group, revise forward-looking revenue, cost, and financing assumptions for the next 3-5 years. Do not automatically carry forward pre-May 2026 forecasts. Document the changes and rationale.

Step 3: Recalculate fair value and value in use
Use revised forecasts to recalculate recoverable amount. If carrying amount exceeds recoverable amount, record an impairment loss. The journal entry is:

Debit: Impairment Loss (P&L or OCI)
Credit: Asset (or accumulated depreciation/amortization for PP&E)

Step 4: Document your conclusion
Prepare a memo documenting:

• Which assets were tested and why
• Which assets were not tested and why (with explicit statement that no triggering event applies)
• Key assumptions in forecasts (revenue growth, cost inflation, WACC, terminal growth)
• Sensitivity of the result to key variables

This memo is your defense to auditors and tax authorities.

Step 5: Prepare IFRS 7 and IAS 36 disclosures
IAS 36 requires disclosure of:

• Description of asset(s) tested and impairment loss amount
• Key assumptions in VIU calculations
• Sensitivity of result to assumption changes
• Change to estimate techniques or key assumptions from prior period

IFRS 7 requires disclosure of credit risk, liquidity risk, and market risk. If regional exposure has changed, update those disclosures too.

The Bottom Line

The May 2026 geopolitical event is material for financial reporting. If you hold assets tangible or intangible, physical or financial with any exposure to affected regions or dependent on affected markets, impairment testing is not optional. It is required.

The CFOs and audit teams that address this proactively in June 2026 before year-end pressures hit will be prepared for clean audits and compliant disclosures. Those that delay will face auditor pushback, possible restatements, and loss of credibility with regulators and investors.

The question is not whether to test. The question is whether you test properly, document thoroughly, and disclose transparently.